A Perfect World - Part 2

The rather vague vision given in Part 1 would appear to be that of a perfect world wouldn't it?  Yet, I find it difficult to believe that such a perfect world could ever exist when human-kind is involved.  I say this based on my evaluation of the humans we have living here on our Earth today. 

Let's begin with the fact that it is blatantly obvious that money defines our human worth.  Those with the most money get to determine the worth and outcomes (fate) of those with less or very little financial wealth.  Those who have so much money that they could not possibly spend it all over the course of several lifetimes, have no care in the world for those who are less fortunate than they are.  They spit in the faces of the poor and the homeless by lobbying for laws, rules and regulations which make it practically impossible for these unfortunate souls to ever recover, destroy the middle class, and pocketing every penny from the unfortunate that they can put in their pockets in the forms of supplemental fees (ripoffs) and ridiculous taxes.  These are the same filthy demons who are strongly against raising the minimum wage,  a wage which is not substantial enough to even pay for the cheapest of housing for a family of two adults, let alone put food on the table or allow for transportation to and from these practically worthless jobs.  What is this truly about?  To an outsider looking in, it would appear that the only use for these unfortunate people is to hold a useless job to pay taxes and bogus fees that they cannot afford simply to pay the six figure yearly salaries of the cronies in the kings' seats who are fortunate enough to make a six figure (or more) yearly salary.

The fortunate will assume position in the church pew on Sundays, it would appear, for appearance's sake only.  I often wonder to myself what message he is receiving from his Jesus, because it is, without a doubt, not the same message that the Christian's Jesus requires of his followers.  Jesus fed the multitudes.  He healed the sick.  He preached love and respect.  The Bible commands to "love thy neighbor," not "let thy neighbor perish".   Jesus never attempted to pass ridiculous laws that were to the detriment of the unfortunate (unworthy).  Jesus would not have allowed for the hungry to go without nourishment.  Jesus was not a money hungry leech who sucked the very vitality out of those who could not afford to pay for his services.  Jesus performed his services to mankind out of love. 

These fortunate mongrels are typically the quickest to judge the unfortunate and label them with stereotypical names, such as "menace to society".  The true menaces to society are those who see the unfortunate continue to fail, while continuing to use their wealth and fortune to assure that they continue to fail.  What is Christ-like about this behavior?  There is nothing Christ-like about this behavior at all.  Simply put, these humans are not of Christ.

My complaints are not only toward the rich and fortunate.  One-hundred percent of those who are fortunate in wealth are not scum.  That is not the message that I am trying to convey here.  My complaints are only with those who use their power and fortune to further detriment society to their own selfish and needless benefit.

My other complaint lies with some of the citizens of American society, particularly those who have clearly not read or understood the Constitution of the United States of America.  For those who are not familiar with what this Constitution stands for, I would strongly suggest that you take the time to read it.  After all, you do live within the country for which this Constitution stands.  This Constitution was not penned only for your benefit, but for the benefit of those with whom you constantly disagree and curse, to ensure that their rights are protected as well.  Stop being so damned offended by everything and just agree to disagree on some things people!  The world would be a much better (peaceful) place if some of you would stop trying to control the masses based on YOUR beliefs.  Believe it or not, in the United States each and every one of us is free to believe as we choose.  We are even free to not believe if that is what we so choose.

For those of you who are up in arms over the fact that "gays" are now allowed to marry, the Constitution itself overrules your desire for their inequality, banishment, and slander based on your religious beliefs.  You do not have to agree with it, but you cannot deny someone with whom you disagree, their equal rights.  The Constitution will never allow for you to do this.  You are fighting a losing battle secondary to the "separation of church and state."  You have no legal ground to stand on, so rather than spewing your hatred and animosity about these "abominations," you really only have two choices:  1) You can either agree to disagree and live side by side in peace and harmony, or 2) You can exercise your right to leave this country which utilizes, and will continue to utilize, the Constitution to dictate its ruling.

I could literally go on and on and on with this, but I'm not going to do so at this time.  I will save that for another post.

A Perfect World - Part 1

QUESTION:  If you were given your very own planet in the universe to do with whatever you would like, what would life on that planet be like?

PLANETARY DESCRIPTION:  If I were to be able to choose a planet that I would like to inhabit, I would definitely choose an earth-like planet, a planet with the full capability to sustain a vast array of lifeforms.  The planet that I would choose would be filled with the similar natural wonders that our Earth has provided us with throughout the millennia.  This Earth-like planet would consist of an array of tall and beautiful mountain ranges, some with snow caps, and others without.  This planet would also contain an abundance of the most beautiful flora that we see here on earth.  There would be waterfalls, streams, oceans, and beaches.  I would fill this planet with selections of my favorite fauna who would not fear the humans who inhabited it.  They would live peacefully side by side.

HUMANKIND:  If I were required to allow human kind to live on this planet, I would be exceptionally choosy about their moral and ethical codes of conduct.  I say this, because I have a significant issues with a great percentage of the humans on this Earth, which we now inhabit (This will be discussed in further detail in Part 2). 

MORAL AND ETHICAL CONDUCT:  Should this planet be inhabited by humans they would be required to live by a positive and ethically moral code of conduct.  These humans should respect others and treat others the way they would want to be treated themselves.  They would help their neighboring human when that human is in need of, or living without, a life-sustaining necessity (food, water, shelter and clothing).  There would be no monetary system to produce greed and judgment based on who has a greater number of points, and wealth would rather be measured in happiness and love.

A perfect world, right?